Feed on
Posts
Comments

The Eastern Cougar Foundation submitted a statement summarizing the reasons for its opposition to an increase in the quota, attaching articles from the June ECF newsletter. We were unable to determine specific reasons for the increase based on scientifically based data. We could not determine if the Commission intends to decrease the cougar population of the Black Hills or believes that increased kill of females will not affect the number of cougars. We don’t know if the basis for the decision was unfounded concern that cougars are depriving human hunters of deer, or that killing more cougars will increase the bighorn sheep population, deciminated by an outbreak of pneumonia contracted from domestic sheep. We pointed out that a reduction of the cougar population could lead to conflicts with humans if trophy males are harvested, because they maintain order in cougar societies.

http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2009/07/01/news/top/doc4a4bde598236e211184774.txt
Rapid City Journal

GF&P commission increases lion hunting quota from 35 to 40

By The Associated Press | Wednesday, July 01, 2009

PIERRE — South Dakota hunters will get a chance to kill more mountain lions next year under changes in the hunting season approved Wednesday by the Game, Fish and Parks Commission.

Supporters of the move said the changes will control the number of mountain lions in the Black Hills while giving more hunters a chance to kill the big cats. Opponents said increased quotas could harm the mountain lion population.

The new hunting season will run Jan. 1 through March 31, but will end earlier if either 40 total lions or 25 females are shot sooner. Hunters who shoot mountain lions must show the animals to state wildlife officials within 24 hours.

The mountain lion season was first held in 2005, and each session has ended early because female quotas were reached.

Staff at the state Department of Game, Fish and Parks recommended in May that a limit of 35 total lions or 20 females, which they said would maintain the Black Hills lion population at its current estimated level of 250. But the commission proposed higher quotas a month ago after some members said they believed the population should be cut to limit conflicts with humans and to reduce the number of elk and deer killed by mountain lions.

An analysis by department staff found the higher quotas might cut the number of mountain lions but the population likely wouldn’t be irreparably harmed.

Hunters cannot shoot any lion with a spotted coat, a rule aimed at protecting kittens. They also cannot shoot any lion accompanying another, a restriction intended to reduce the killing of females and orphaning of kittens. Dogs cannot be used in hunting the cats.

Landowners outside the Black Hills who buy licenses can shoot cougars year-round on land they own or lease.

Opponents of the increased limits said South Dakota should have no hunting season for mountain lions, but if one is held to stick with last year’s quotas.

Sharon Seneczko, a Custer veterinarian and founder of the Black Hills Mountain Lion Foundation, said the increased quota for females means that more kittens are likely to be orphaned before they are fully equipped to survive on their own.

The mountain lion population has stabilized but has not exploded, Seneczko said. Quotas should be left unchanged for several years so state biologists can study how hunting affects cougar numbers, she said.

Tom Huhnerkoch, a Deadwood veterinarian and mountain lion advocate, said supporters of hunting spread lies and fear by making claims that mountain lions kill too many deer and elk. He said especially incorrect was some hunters’ claims that the cats will likely kill a child.

Mountain lions often live around people without causing problems or even being noticed, Huhnerkoch said.

“Towns and cougars can get along,” he said.

Tim R. Goodwin of Rapid City, a hunter, asked the commission to approve the increased quotas to give more hunters a chance at mountain lions.

“I don’t feel bad about hunting mountain lions,” Goodwin said, explaining that the cats have a big advantage over hunters in the forest. “It’s the grandaddy of all the hunting seasons we have in South Dakota.”

Go the website to see a “slide show” with remote camera photos of jags, a puma, ocelot and jaguarundi.
http://www.valleycentral.com/news/news_story.aspx?id=319685
ValleyCentral.com

The Nature Report: Jaguars in Tamaulipas

By Richard Moore
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 at 11:36 a.m.

The sprawling, thickly wooded mountains of northern Mexico are home to abundant wildlife, but researchers were surprised by what they discovered when they began setting up remote cameras in the rugged sierra of Tamaulipas earlier this year.

Jaguar, puma, ocelot, jaguarundi and bobcat have all been documented at Rancho Caracol, an 11,000-acre ranch just 150 miles south of Brownsville.

Just getting to many of the camera locations is a challenge, and after the four wheel drive runs out of trail, the hiking begins.

Chad Stasey is a feline researcher with Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute at Texas A&M Kingsville, and once a month he spends a couple of days checking 25 trail cams.

“The cats like it a little bit rougher than I do,” Stasey said.

Arturo Caso, also with Caesar Kleberg, has been studying cats in Mexico for a decade and is helping to coordinate the research.

“First of all, I want to thank Caracol Ranch, because they have been really supportive of this program,” Caso said. “When we first set up our cameras, I want to be honest we did not expect to have so much success. It was really a pleasant surprise to find all these cats here at this ranch, and we are really working to try and conserve these cats for the future.”

Dean Putegnat from Brownsville is the owner of Rancho Caracol, which is a world class destination for white wing and quail hunters, and he is very supportive of the cat research.

“The jaguar to people is a special animal, and they see that and they share it. It works out well for us,” he said.

The jaguar, jaguarundi and ocelot are protected by law in Mexico and researches are hoping to apply knowledge they acquire at Rancho Caracol to helping save the endangered ocelot in South Texas.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/earth/4321949.html?page=1
Popular Mechanics - June 27, 2009

As once-threatened animal populations including black bears, mountain lions and alligators rebound and people move into former wildlands, predators are showing up precisely where they don’t belong: in backyards. And the wildlife isn’t as afraid of us as we might think. Welcome to the food chain.

By Erin McCarthy
Published in the July 2009 issue.

It was the perfect ending to a perfect afternoon. Gary Mann and his girlfriend Helen were watching the sun go down after a satisfying day clearing brush in the backyard of Mann’s home in Sutter Creek, Calif. A pile of branches and twigs was burning merrily, throwing shadows into the growing darkness as the couple’s three dogs—a 50-pound Shar-Pei named Tigger and a pair of Rottweiler mixes, Takota and Tenaya—played at their feet.

Mann’s home is the kind of place nature lovers dream of. The house is set back from the road on a densely wooded, 10-acre parcel bordered by government land and private property; wild turkeys and deer—up to a dozen at a time—wander through daily. Beyond the backyard lawn, 80 feet from the house, ponderosa and oak grow thickly on the steep slopes of a hill.

That February night, Helen heard crackling and snapping of underbrush and saw something large moving along the edge of the trees. When Tigger went to investigate, with Takota close behind, Mann didn’t stop them, even though he knew mountain lions roamed the area. One had peered through his neighbor’s window, scaring the woman inside, and another neighbor had recently seen a big male lion in Mann’s driveway. “The lions come in pretty far,” Mann says. “Common sense would have said, don’t let the dogs go. But I’ve been living up here for eight years, and it’s rare that they attack dogs.”

Suddenly, the couple heard Tigger “screaming for her life,” Mann says. When he ran down to the edge of the woods, he could only see shadows and fleeting movement in the thick underbrush. Whatever was attacking the Shar-Pei growled at him. Takota rushed in, and then it was over—the animal released Tigger and took off. “We think Takota scared it,” Mann says. “It all happened in about 10 seconds.”

Tigger’s injuries were serious. The skin over her head had been split open to the bone, her left eye almost torn out. Deep claw marks ran down her back. Mann held the wounds closed as he and Helen rushed Tigger to the vet, who confirmed that the injuries had been caused by a mountain lion.

Tigger survived, but since the incident Mann has kept the dogs out of the woods. “I’m still here and the lion is still here,” he says. “My neighbors said it was up at their property two nights ago. To attack a dog near a house when two adults are out in the yard with a fire going—that’s when you have to start worrying. There are lots of kids just a couple of blocks from here.”

When Europeans settled the New World, they dealt with predators by showing them the business end of a gun. Wherever pioneers settled, populations of large predators—mountain lions, bears, wolves, alligators—plummeted or disappeared entirely. That search-and-destroy mission continued virtually unabated until the rise of the environmental movement in the 1960s and ’70s, when the national attitude began to evolve. People came to believe that what was left of wilderness and its inhabitants should be preserved for future generations.

This ideology has clearly worked: Since the passage of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 14 species of animals that were on the brink of extinction have recovered. Alligators were removed from the list in 1987; gray wolves in 2009. The grizzly bear, confined mostly to Yellowstone National Park in the lower 48 states, was delisted in 2007. As for once heavily hunted mountain lions, some 50,000 of the big cats now inhabit North America, with populations in the United States as far east as North Dakota. Experts predict that lions eventually will reinhabit the Adirondacks in New York, the Maine woods and the Great Smoky Mountains of Tennessee.

Few people anticipated that rebounding populations would create a new problem: an increase in animal attacks as predators returned to former ranges now occupied by humans. In August 2002, a black bear killed a 5-month-old girl in the Catskills, a hundred miles northwest of New York City; the baby had been sleeping in a carriage on the porch. In January 2004, a mountain lion killed a male bicyclist in Whiting Ranch Wilderness Park in Orange County, Calif., then attacked a 31-year-old woman a few hours later. Other bicyclists managed to save the victim, but not before she sustained serious injuries. In October 2007, an alligator snatched and killed an 83-year-old woman outside her daughter’s home in Savannah, Ga. The next day, her body was found in a pond, hands and a foot missing. And, in May 2008, a coyote bit a 2-year-old girl playing in a Chino Hills, Calif., park and attempted to drag her off.

Though the trend is worrisome, the absolute number of attacks remains small. Fatal black bear attacks on humans have doubled since the late 1970s, increasing from one to just two incidents per year. (About six people are injured each year.) Between 1890 and 2008, there were 110 mountain lion attacks in North America; half of the 20 fatalities resulting from these attacks occurred in the past two decades. Despite an alligator population too large to count, the U.S. had just 391 attacks and 18 fatalities between 1948 and 2005. Coyotes have caused only one known fatality in the U.S.

Still, the relationship between animals and humans is proving to be more complex than simply kill ’em all or love ’em all—even though some of the old, romantic ideas about living at one with nature linger. “If you ask people why they moved where they did, you discover that they moved to be immersed in nature and wildlife,” says Marc Bekoff, professor emeritus of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Colorado–Boulder. “The fastest way to decrease the experience is to start killing the animals.”

Whether homeowners welcome large animals into their neighborhoods or see them as life-threatening intruders, most people recognize that we’ve entered a new era: Predators and humans today often share.

Officials in Slidell, La., capture an alligator that bit off an 11-year-old boy’s arm as he swam in a local pond. The gator had lived there for years without incident. (Photograph by Scott Threlkeld/The Times-Picayune)

Officials in Slidell, La., capture an alligator that bit off an 11-year-old boy’s arm as he swam in a local pond. The gator had lived there for years without incident. (Photograph by Scott Threlkeld/The Times-Picayune)


The carefully manicured
lawns of suburban and exurban developments may look domesticated, but they often occupy what were recently wildlands. These transitional zones between habitats, known as ecotones, are expanding at an unprecedented rate—providing more opportunities for human–predator interaction. Urban land area in the U.S. has quadrupled from 15 million acres in 1945 to 60 million in 2002; rural residential land has increased by an average of 1.2 million acres per year since 1980.

But the spread of human populations doesn’t necessarily come at the expense of predators. The semiwild environments desired by humans are often equally attractive to apex animals, and in many regions, human and predator populations are growing hand-in-hand. Nowhere is this more evident than in America’s gator belt, which extends from North Carolina down through Florida and west to Louisiana and Texas. There, people have moved into the wetlands where alligators live, and they’ve created ponds and canals within subdivisions that alligators consider appealing habitats.

In July 2008, 11-year-old Devin Funck and two friends escaped the stifling Louisiana heat by taking a dip in Crystal Lake, a flooded former gravel pit in a subdivision near Slidell. Funck was playing in the shallows when an alligator grabbed his arm, dragged him to deeper water and pulled him under. After a struggle, Funck poked the gator in the eye and pulled free, but his left arm was gone, torn off at the shoulder. Friends ran for help, and within an hour emergency responders were rushing the boy to hospital.

According to local news reports, area residents knew the gator lived in the popular swimming hole; in fact, they had even given the 10-foot 8-inch, 500-pound reptile a name—Big Joe. It took nearly 3 hours for hunters to find and kill Big Joe and cut Funck’s bluish but intact arm from its stomach. Doctors were unable to reattach the limb, however, and Devin now wears a prosthesis.

Experts can offer no explanation as to why the gator, which had patrolled Crystal Lake for years without incident, attacked Funck. And neither can residents: Two boys who often swam in the lake said that the alligators there usually swim away when approached. “The set of circumstances that takes a human–alligator interaction to the next step, to an attack—we don’t know what that trigger is,” says University of Florida professor and gator expert Frank Mazzotti.

As animals and people encounter each other more frequently, creatures can lose their sense of fear. It’s called habituation—a process by which an animal, after a period of exposure to a stimulus, stops responding. “Through experience, animals learn that people or developments are not threats, so their natural fear decreases,” says Tania Lewis, a U.S. Geological Survey biologist at Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve in Alaska.

When animals are no longer afraid of humans, they no longer try to avoid them—and the results can be deadly. In January 1991, 18-year-old Scott Lancaster was killed—and partially eaten—by a mountain lion as he jogged a quarter-mile from his Idaho Springs, Colo., high school. This case and other human–lion interactions in and around Boulder, Colo., were the basis of the book The Beast in the Garden, in which author David Baron argues that mountain lions have become habituated. “As wildlife invades suburbs,” Baron wrote, “and as suburbs invade wildlife habitat, we are changing animal behavior in unexpected and sometimes troubling ways. Rarely has the behavioral shift been so well documented, as in the case of Boulder’s lions.” The lions, he argues, weren’t afraid of people; in fact, the cats had changed their diets to include pets and sometimes people—and were teaching their offspring to do the same.

University of Northern Arizona professor Paul Beier scoffs at the idea of species-wide mountain lion habituation—as well as the notion that people are now lion prey. “It’s just not true,” he says. “If people were on the menu, we’d have an attack every day.” Though habituation can occur in individual animals, “The idea that it’s happening broadly as a phenomenon is not consistent with the number of attacks we see, which is still less than one fatality a year. Every mountain lion has had an opportunity to kill a human, so 99.9 percent of mountain lions don’t bother to chomp us.”

Beier, who keeps records of mountain lion attacks and has tagged and tracked 32 lions, says all predators experiment with different types of prey. “They have prey that they specialize in eating, but occasionally they’ll eat something else—that’s how they learn,” he says. “If you think about it, that’s necessary for animals to evolve. Maybe they’re trying something new that’s about the size of a deer but has two legs. But, by and large, they don’t.”

Even if humans don’t turn into prey for all predators, the USGS’s Lewis—whose husband was Scott Lancaster’s classmate—believes habituation does happen, and not just for mountain lions, but for bears, coyotes, alligators and most other animals that regularly come into contact with humans. “Wildlife will habituate,” she says. “We have an effect on each other—whenever people and animals encounter each other, animals learn from that, and that helps shape their behavior the next time they have an encounter.”

When summer rolls around,  our backyards turn into a smorgasbord for wildlife. Uncleaned grills, bird feeders, dog food left on the porch and garbage stuffed into unsecured bins can lure creatures to our doorsteps. And once an

In 2008, Anne Hjelle returned to the trail where she was attacked by a mountain lion four years before. The 122-pound cougar bit Hjelle 40 times; 200 stitches and six surgeries were required to repair the damage to her face

In 2008, Anne Hjelle returned to the trail where she was attacked by a mountain lion four years before. The 122-pound cougar bit Hjelle 40 times; 200 stitches and six surgeries were required to repair the damage to her face

animal has an easily obtained meal, it keeps coming back. The process through which animals learn that people are a source of high-quality calories is called food conditioning. “Sometimes wild animals get accustomed to a certain source of food, and they forgo other sources,” Bekoff says. “Why hunt for a rabbit when you can get a freebie handout at Joe’s?”

This was just the kind of situation Denise Haldeman walked right into in May 2008. She went outside after dark to take down the bird feeders in the backyard of her Barbours, Pa., home. Her dog, Panda, tore into the darkness, but Haldeman thought the 12-year-old Lab mix was chasing another dog that sometimes ran loose in the neighborhood.
Then she saw the black bear. It was standing on its hind legs, just a few feet away, clicking its teeth. As Haldeman turned to flee, the bear struck her from behind, knocking her facedown on the patio. “The bear was standing on me, biting my head,” Haldeman later told reporters.

The bear left without attacking her further. Haldeman was treated for wounds on her head, face, arms and legs. Panda was not so lucky; the dog, which had also encountered the bear, died from its injuries. Authorities later determined that Haldeman had unwittingly come between a sow and her cubs; 10 days later the bears, which had previously been seen around the neighborhood, were trapped in Haldeman’s yard and relocated about 150 miles away.

Black bears, usually considered far more docile than grizzlies, will typically flee when confronted by a human, says Stephen Herrero, author of Bear Attacks: Their Causes and Avoidance. He has been studying bear attacks for 42 years. Food-conditioned black bears can become aggressive—a learned behavior from the wild, where they must defend their food from other bears.

Most attacks are defensive—when people are in a bear’s space, it feels uncomfortable and may attack the perceived threat. But some attacks are predatory. “There’s the odd black bear—and this is where the fatalities come from—that just decides, Well, I’ve been eating deer all my life, I think I’ll try out that two-legged thing,” Herrero says. “That pattern of behavior is very recognizable. The bear walks around, sizes things up, and when it decides to go for it, it goes for it.” But most predatory attacks take place in the wilderness. Herrero says that backyard predatory behavior is peculiar, and biologists haven’t yet figured out why it’s happening.

Though bears are the poster children for food conditioning, they are by no means the only susceptible animals. “Coyotes that have become problems have been fed,” Bekoff says. “It’s hard to think of any exceptions.” In August 1981, a 3-year-old girl from Glendale, Calif., was waiting in the driveway for her father to find his car keys when a coyote grabbed her by the throat. Before the father could chase the animal away, it dragged the toddler through the street; she later died of a broken neck and blood loss. Bekoff, who worked the case, says the neighbors had been feeding the coyote, perhaps in hopes that regular meals would prevent the wild animal from attacking pets. Wolves, raccoons and even alligators can also become food-conditioned.

Humanity isn’t likely to stop expanding into wildlife habitat. Though the risk of a fatal animal attack—or any animal attack—is less than the chance of getting struck by lightning (1 in 400,000), every time we step in the water in Florida, or jog alone in mountain lion territory, we are at risk. So how can we successfully live in this deceptively tame-looking new wilderness?

Most biologists argue that the simplest solution—eradicating predators—would be counterproductive. “If you kill animals, other animals come in,” Bekoff says, pointing out that wolves once kept coyote populations in check, and without that natural predator, coyote populations have exploded. Besides, Bekoff says, “people are against the wanton killing of these animals.”

The key, then, might be to adapt ourselves. “We live with wildlife, and when we choose to build our house in the middle of the forest, we’ve now put our house in their backyard,” says Charles Schwartz, a research wildlife biologist at Montana State University. Predators once roamed the land unchallenged, yet if we’re smart—giving animals the respect they deserve and reconsidering how we dispose of garbage, what foliage we plant—we can live together.

“They’re wild animals, and they’re predators,” Mazzotti says. “Treating them with that small amount of respect and intelligence is the best thing we can do to live with them.”

Stuart Kenn to speak on Friday, July 3rd.

The reprint of this classic book by R. D. Lawrence will be officially launched on July 3, 2009, by Lawrence’s widow Sharon at Minden, Ontario. Stuart Kenn, founder and president of the Ontario Puma Foundation, will speak.

FOR INFORMATION CALL 705-286-2298
rdlawrenceplace@mindenhills.ca ~ www.mindenculturalcentre.com
176 Bobcaygeon Road, Minden, Ontario

The book: In the fall of 1973, R.D. Lawrence purchased enough food and supplies for ten months in the wilderness near Revelstoke, British Columbia. During the summer he’d hired a private plane and searched the region, looking for a cougar for his planned long term, “noninvasive” study. Eventually he saw one running across an open space. He ferried in his supplies by canoe and used the ruins of an abandoned mining camp to construct a small, snug cabin. Then he started looking for sign of the cougar. He soon found a kill and hid himself nearby. Over the ensuring months the two potentially dangerous predators—man and cougar, which he named The Ghost Walker—established a relationship. Lawrence wasn’t always the stalker. A unique story and an excellent read for anyone who loves wildlife and wilderness. The book was originally published in 1983.

Safe crossings not only benefit wildlife but save human lives. Approximately 150 people are killed each year in collisions with deer, and more 10,000 are injured. Damage to vehicles amounts to $ billion annually - http://www.car-accidents.com/pages/deer-accident-statistics.html

http://www.tallahassee.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090622/CAPITOLNEWS/906220311&s=d&page=2
Tallahassee.com

Officials defend eco-passage

US Senator calls stimulus funding for Lake Jackson tunnels ‘wasteful’

By Bill Cotterell • Florida Capital Bureau Political Editor • June 22, 2009

Laugh if you will, but state transportation officials and wildlife researchers said Wednesday a $3.4 million pair of tunnels under a busy North Florida highway is a serious safety project — for people, too

A hearty national guffaw started early this week when Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., released a list of 100 items he called wasteful in President Obama’s federal stimulus package. The Lake Jackson “eco-passage,” a few miles north of Florida’s capitol, caught national media attention, from the Wall Street Journal to the Los Angeles Times.

But Kevin Thibault, assistant secretary for engineering and operations in the state Department of Transportation, said the “turtle tunnel” ridicule missed a couple of salient points. First, the money won’t detract from Interstate highways or airports, but will come from a small “enhancement” pot that is set aside for just such work.

And second, the twin tunnels under a four-lane stretch of U.S. 27 north of Tallahassee will be big enough for a deer to scamper through — thus making the road a lot safer for motorists who don’t want to hit one at 50 or 60 miles an hour. Even a major alligator or turtle can be a highly hazardous speed bump in the dark, said DOT spokesman Dick Kane.

“The federal stimulus package that was passed by Congress funded a lot of transportation and safety projects,” said Thibault. He said Florida’s $1.35 billion DOT share includes about $900 million for major transportation projects, $400 million for local roads and bridges and $40 million for “enhancement” work like the Lake Jackson tunnels.

Jack Kostrzewa, planning manager for the Capital Regional Transportation Planning Agency, and Matt Aresco, director of the Nokuse Plantation wildlife preserve in Walton County, said U.S. 27 would never be built as it is, if today’s environmental standards were in place 50 years ago. Aresco said about 62 species need to cross the road in the forests around Lake Jackson.

“It’s a safety issue,” said Kostrezewa. “We’re trying to separate wildlife from the road.”

http://morningsentinel.mainetoday.com/news/local/6512426.html
Kennebec Journal - Morning Sentinel

MOUNTAIN LION IN WINSLOW? MAYBE

06/24/2009

SURPRISE: Lin Stout sits beside her children Cullen, center, and Liam at their home on the South Ridge Road in Winslow on Tuesday. The three watched what is believed to be a mountain lion come out of the woods and onto their lawn 20- feet away near the swing set in background on Monday. Photo by David Leaming

SURPRISE: Lin Stout sits beside her children Cullen, center, and Liam at their home on the South Ridge Road in Winslow on Tuesday. The three watched what is believed to be a mountain lion come out of the woods and onto their lawn 20- feet away near the swing set in background on Monday. Photo by David Leaming

WINSLOW — A reported sighting of a mountain lion late Monday afternoon by a woman and her sons has caught the interest of state experts.

Informed of the Winslow sighting on Tuesday, Wally Jakubas, mammal-group leader for Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife and the agency’s point person on mountain lions, said there had been another possible mountain lion report last week in the northern Augusta area, in which a feces sample (also known as scat) was recovered and is being analyzed.

Although around 20 sightings are reported annually, there have been only two scientifically confirmed cases of mountain lions in Maine: The first was in 1938 near the Maine-Quebec border and the second was in 1995 in Cape Elizabeth.

Mountain lions are also known as cougars and pumas. State officials believe most mountain lion sightings, if they’re legitimate, are of animals that have been captive and are released.

“I’m intrigued,” Jakubas said. “We had this report of the scat (in Augusta). I think the important thing is these are unconfirmed reports and the general history of these things is, when you look into them, they don’t pan out.”

Even so, the Winslow sighting “is a very convincing story,” he said, and a state biologist from the department’s Sidney office is investigating.

The sighting occurred around 4:45 p.m. Lin Stout said she and her sons Cullen, 9, and Liam, 5, were at a swing set in their backyard off South Ridge Drive when they saw the long tail bobbing through ferns and brush. They live on a 5-acre property within a subdivision that is surrounded by woods.

The tan tail, standing about 3 feet high, had a 3-inch, dark brown tip, Stout said. It was about 20 feet away, she said. Cullen ran back to the house; Liam and his mother watched.

“My 5-year-old says, ‘Mommy, a lion’s tail!’ I said, ‘It’s not like a lion you see at the zoo; it’s a mountain lion,’” Stout said.

Stout said they were about 30 feet away from the house and back deck. They froze in place as the tail disappeared back into the brush, silently.

“We did not hear any snaps of twigs, no crunches of leaves; it was like it was a ghost,” Stout said. “My son said it’s a ghost cat.”

Stout said she and her son began slowly walking back toward the house when the animal stepped out from the woods — in full view — less than 20 feet away from them. Stout said she recognized the animal as a mountain lion, describing it as perhaps weighing 130 pounds, with a large cat-like face, yellow eyes, “huge” paws, and that long tail they had seen in the brush.

Racing through Stout’s mind was the thought of what she would do if the animal leaped at them. She decided to drop to the ground and cover her son, if it came to that.

But Stout said the mountain lion seemed uninterested in them and focused on a nearby marsh area. Stout said they began slowly backing up because the mountain lion seemed not to be interested in them.

“It didn’t look menacing to us; it didn’t growl or show its teeth,” Stout said. “It was looking at the marsh. I didn’t feel that afraid; I felt more calm.”

Then, as Stout picked up her son, the 5-year-old screamed.

“I think he realized then this was a very large animal and it was wild,” she said. “That startled the animal, but it did not ever come at us.”

That’s also when Stout finally saw what the animal had been fixated on: a black, domestic cat that had wandered into the marsh area. Liam, she said, screamed, “Run kitty, run!”

Stout said the mountain lion then took one giant leap back into the woods — without making a sound. The entire encounter with the animal in full view lasted perhaps 30 seconds, Stout said.

After the encounter, Stout contacted Charles Theobald, animal control officer for the Winslow Police Department.

The animal fit the description of an eastern mountain lion, Theobald said. He suggested that the Stouts take extra precautions when going out in the area — such as having the kids wear bells.

“It’s wildlife; it’s Maine,” Theobald said. “You’re going to come across wildlife.”

Over the years, many people have mistaken mountain lions and their tracks for bobcats, coyotes, foxes, even house-cats, Jakubas said.

But there’s no evidence of a sustained, wild population of mountain lions in Maine, he said.

The nearest such populations are in Iowa and Michigan — it’s debated whether they are wild in Quebec — and so legitimate sightings of mountain lions likely involve animals that have been released into the wild, he said.

Stuart Kenn has shared the report on his investigation and his recommendations to the farmer with the Eastern Cougar Foundation.  He is certain that coyotes were responsible for the calf deaths.  If you would like to see Kenn’s report and photographs, contact Helen McGinnis - helenmcginnis@easterncougar.org .

http://www.thebarrieexaminer.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1621620
The Barrie Examiner

Farmer fears cougar killing his livestock

AGRICULTURE: Springwater Township man says he is losing calves to a larger predator

Posted By BOB BRUTON
June 20, 2009

Something is tearing apart and killing calves on the Camack cattle farm in Springwater Township, north of Barrie.

That something could be a cougar.

Merle and Debbie Camack have been losing calves for the past few years to an unknown predator on their Vespra Valley Road farm.

Most recently, a 100-pound calf was born Wednesday and was found dead Thursday.

“Something carried it 150 feet, then dragged it 150 feet. Probably there was a struggle,” Merle said, yesterday. “I saw the vultures.

“And I’m not the only farm around here losing calves. I don’t know what to do.”

“We’re losing one per week plus a day. It’s a cycle,” Debbie said, noting there may have been more calves killed than counted.

“Sometimes we don’t find any body at all. They have been dragged away somewhere.”

The Camacks lost 12 calves last year, and have lost seven calves so far this year, from their heard of about 160 cows and calves on two pastures.

They think it’s the work of a cougar. Dave Riddell of the Simcoe County

Federation of Agriculture said he also thinks it’s a cougar.

“And it’s not coyotes, just because of the way the animals are being killed,” he said.

“They’re being skinned from the rib cage down, to the back leg,” said Debbie. “It could be more than one (cougar).”

Stuart Kenn of the Ontario Puma Foundation isn’t so sure. He was at the Camack farm on yesterday, looking at the remains and measuring tracks.

“There are a lot of coyote tracks out here,” he said. “But something has been preying on these calves.”

Kenn wasn’t ready to say it was a cougar, but it’s a possibility.

“They are around this area,” he said. “They have the right food supply, habitat, it’s an isolated area and it’s away from human beings. But I’m not sure (it’s a cougar).”

Neither is the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR).

“We’re thinking it’s a coyote,” MNR spokesperson Jolanta Kowalski said yesterday.

“There is absolutely no evidence that it’s a cougar,” she said, adding that municipal livestock evaluators were on the scene yesterday. They are called in to determine what did, or didn’t, cause the death and to also determine if a farmer is eligible for compensation.

The Camacks are compensated when they lose their livestock, at $160 per animal. The money comes from the township, which gets it from the county, which gets it from the province.

Riddell noted that cougars are an endangered species.

“If you shoot and kill it, you can be charged,” he said. “But if it’s affecting your livelihood, you can dispose of it.”

Merle Camack said that’s no easy task.

“I’m a very good shot with a rifle, but I don’t think I could shoot and hit one if it was coming at me,” he said.

Already this year there have been reported cougar sightings near Owen Sound and Peterborough.

Ontario’s Ministry of Natural Resources says cougars, or pumas, are large, tawny or greyish brown carnivores with long tails and rounded ears.

Eastern Cougar is the name used to describe animals inhabiting the northeastern portion of the North American range.

It is listed under Ontario’s Endangered Species Act, 2007, which protects the species and its habitat.

Cougars feed mostly on deer, but will also take a variety of smaller mammals.

There have been hundreds of sightings of cougars in Ontario during the years, and their presence here is generally acknowledged.

Cougars in Northern Ontario are of unknown origin, but may have moved into the province from the west, or may represent remnants of the original population.

But cougars in Southern Ontario are considered to be escaped pets. As such, these animals would have a wide variety of genetic backgrounds.

“There certainly aren’t any wild cougars running around (here),” Kowalski said.

“The vast majority of these cougar sightings are something else.

*******************************************************

http://www.thebarrieexaminer.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1624443
The Barrie Examiner
June 23, 2009

Cougars aren’t to blame: expert

By BOB BRUTON

It’s not a cougar, it’s coyotes that are preying on Springwater Township cattle, says the president of the Ontario Puma Foundation.

Stuart Kenn says he and Ministry of Natural Resources biologist Greg Cull did a three-hour investigation Friday of the Camack farm on Vespra Valley Road.

“We have come to the conclusion that the culprits were coyotes,” Kenn said yesterday. “There were several coyote tracks of various sizes indicating a pack with young tagging along.

“There were absolutely no signs of puma (cougar) or bear tracks anywhere and the remains of the calf (were) not covered with debris at all, and there was no sign of hair being cut away from the skin.”

But Merle Camack, who has lost 19 head of cattle in the last two years, says their investigation of the dead calf was seriously flawed.

“They (Cull and Kenn) showed up 36 hours after it (the calf ) was killed,” he said. “There were no coyote tracks when I found it.”

Camack also said the remains were found hundreds of feet from where the calf was killed.

“Don’t tell me a 50-pound coyote could carry a 100-pound calf,” he said. “Coyotes didn’t kill it.”

Camack said that at a market price of $1,200 a head, this predator is also costing him money — about $22,800 so far. Instead he’s compensated $140-$160 per head, when there’s proof of a kill.

Kenn said last week that a cougar was a possibility, that the big cats are in this area. The food supply, habitat and isolation from humans are all to the cougar’s liking.

But his explanation of why it’s coyotes this time, not a cougar, is nothing if not detailed.

He says Camack’s lower electrical wires around the herd were about 26 inches above the ground, which is plenty of room for any coyote to crawl underneath. The upper wire was only 36 inches above the ground — plenty of room for a spooked calf to jump over the wire.

“We believe the coyote(s) entered the area under the wire and spooked the herd,” Kenn said. “The calf was selected out and it jump the wire to escape.

“Once outside the pen, the coyotes took it down and dragged it to the middle of the field, where it was ripped apart and consumed.”

He said the rest of the herd stayed put since the electrical fence kept the adults at bay. The drag marks did not start until about 10 metres from the enclosure.

“So it was not killed in the enclosure. It would be impossible for any animal to carry a calf this size over the fence without either being shocked or the calf getting stuck,” Kenn said. “The drag marks were not in a direct path to where the carcass was located. The drag pattern was zig-zagged as if the animal(s) pulling it were struggling to take it away.”

He said there were plenty of coyote prints leading away from the calf carcass.

“After following the prints down the field to a dense forest, we noticed several prints heading in the direction of the herd; likely from earlier that night when the coyotes were coming in,” Kenn said.

In addition to shoring up the fences, he advised Camack to contact a professional trapper to deal with area coyotes.

Camack said that advice isn’t much help.

“They gave me a list of trappers,” he said. “I’m not a hunter and I’m not a trapper, but these people (on the list) couldn’t trap a rabbit.”

The MNR’s position is that cougars in Southern Ontario are considered to be escaped pets, and there are not any wild ones.

The Eastern Cougar Foundation and the Ontario Puma Foundation agree that calling 911 is unadvisable when a cougar is sighted unless an attack has occurred or is imminent.  Most encounters with cougars are not dangerous.

There are safe ways to handle cougars in developed areas that would often enable the cougar to survive.  Read the piece entitled “WHAT TO DO WITH A COUGAR IN AN INAPPROPRIATE PLACE” in the ABOUT EASTERN COUGARS/ENCOUNTERS WITH HUMANS AND LIVESTOCK section of this website.

Dr. Rick Rosatte of the MNR says “I have investigated all of the apparent sightings (2 are credible) in the Peterborough area, have set up 3 cameras in the vicinity of the sightings with bait, and have covered all of the bush areas with no evidence of a cougar (not to say there is not one around I just can’t find it). As soon as the police receive the call they call MNR then MNR calls me.”

***************************************

http://www.thepeterboroughexaminer.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1617823

Peterborough Examiner

MNR not co-operating in big-cat issue: Human-society boss

Posted By ANDREA HOUSTON/Examiner Staff Writer

June 18, 2009

The general manager of the Peterborough Humane Society says he is frustrated that the Ministry of Natural Resources isn’t willing to work with him to find the mysterious “big cat” that’s been reported prowling the area.

“For some reason the MNR doesn’t want the humane society involved in this,” said Brad Algar. “There’s no co-operation whatsoever.”

The humane society has received “numerous calls” reporting a big wild cat, possibly a cougar, first seen in the area in April, he said.

Of the calls, three have been eyewitnesses who have seen the animal, Algar said.

Algar told The Examiner that he was recently given a picture of a cat, “larger than a domestic cat, possibly a lynx or a bobcat.”

The grainy and blurry picture, snapped with a Polaroid camera, was taken in April by a farmer’s wife who lives near Pinto’s Corners by the old Mustang drive-in, he said.

“It’s got a white patch on its chest, but we just don’t know for sure what it is,” he said. “You can see it’s a lot bigger than a tomcat.”

Algar said he’s also upset that the MNR is telling people to call police if the animal is seen anywhere in the area.

“If people do what the MNR is telling them to do and call 911, the cougar is dead,” he said. “I’m trying to prevent that from happening.”

Last week, Lorraine Norris, senior fish and wildlife specialist with the ministry, said her office couldn’t confirm if the animal is a cougar.

She said the ministry set up trail cameras around the area to try and capture any cougar sightings. The cameras have only captured pictures of coyotes, raccoons and deer, she said.

Older Posts »